- VMWARE VS VIRTUALBOX FOR LINUX MAC OS X
- VMWARE VS VIRTUALBOX FOR LINUX SOFTWARE
- VMWARE VS VIRTUALBOX FOR LINUX WINDOWS
VMWARE VS VIRTUALBOX FOR LINUX WINDOWS
Windows 98SE, because VBox doesn't have any guest utilities for them. VMware is also better for old versions of Windows, e.g. Contrariwise, it's a lot easier to tell a VirtualBox VM to boot from a different drive, since you can do it in the GUI there, but for VMware you have to either hammer the key to get into the BIOS setup or just edit the. Generally I use 64-bit Windows for my host OS.Īs of a few versions ago, VMware had much faster USB 2.0 emulation than VB did, so any virtual machine that needed an external USB hard drive was done in VMware.
VMWARE VS VIRTUALBOX FOR LINUX MAC OS X
I know VMWare beats Virtualbox in this area for windows, but i haven't tested it for linux so i can't judge which one is better if you want to do things like watch videos or play some low-end graphic games.I generally use VMware Player for Windows & Mac OS X VMs and VirtualBox for Linux distros, mainly because the guest utilities are better (at any rate, more convenient) for those respective platforms. Virtualbox supports 3D accelerated VMs, however you can only dedicate a small amount (128mb) of VRAM to it, this means that games (even something as simple as Visual Novels) are probably never going to run well in a standard virtualbox setup. I didn't do any benchmarking or anything to support my theory, this is just based on my gut feelings, but no one else answered yet.Īs a side note, to use a tablet on a virtual machine you need to disable mouse pointer emulation (if it's enabled) and passthrough the tablet (which means it cannot be used on the host OS unless you unplug it from the VM first, i imagine this can be done with a command easily)
In some cases (arch for one) it's going to be easier to set up a Linux guest on it than VMWare, and there's a good chance it'll perform better too. Unless VMWare Player has some feature that VirtualBox doesn't that you want to use, I would go with Virtualbox.
(Meaning that VMWare hasn't really been thinking much about linux guests for the past years I would assume) The performance also seems slightly better than what i remember from VMware Player, and it should tell you something that when setting up a Linux VM in virtualbox it allows you to select a ton of distros, but in VMWare player it only has a handful of distros and "Other(Kernel 2.6.x)" or something like that. I installed Arch-Linux on virtualbox, i've installed it on vmware player before and it was a pain to set up, but on virtualbox (although not easy, as is traditional for arch) it was much more straightforward. My guess is that it's VirtualBox, but i really just don't know.Īs a side question, since I've got an i7 processor with 8 logical cores, i'd like to know how i should divide the processors between the systems, should i go 4/4 or 6/2 or maybe even 5/3? (Do i really need a lot of processing power for what i'll be doing in the linux guest)
VMWARE VS VIRTUALBOX FOR LINUX SOFTWARE
So which virtualization software performs better on a Windows Host with a Linux Guest?
(But i'd probably do a 16/8 split instead) Memory isn't a problem, I could split 12 and 12 gigs between the two systems and never run out on either one. The work i intend to do on Linux is largely graphical save for programming (I intend to use MyPaint and GIMP a lot and I'm also an indie game dev so i'll probably test run a few games on it that are graphically easy (like Visual Novels).įor hardware passthrough, since I'll be drawing some I need the VM to access my tablet, i doubt this is a problem for either one of the programs. With a Linux host I've learned that anyone with good eyes can see that VMWare-Player outclasses VirtualBox in performance for Windows guests. So I decided after a lot of frustration that i should just bite it and use Windows as a host and Linux as a guest. I guess I'm just not proficient enough with Linux's under-the-hood stuff to get it right as is. I'm very hopeful that in the not-so-distant future VGA-Passthrough technology will be better developed and easier to use so I could set up a Linux host and a Windows guest machine.īut right now that's not an option since even if I've tried a few times to do so, I always failed. I've got a desktop that I use for gaming, I really love Linux but I love my games too much to abandon them for Linux.
0 kommentar(er)
